disconscious ([info]disconscious) wrote,
@ 2006-08-04 05:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:lj

List of banned user

This is the list of people I banned over time. I can't remember why for most of them. There are three main groups of banned users: the obsessive, the abusive and the argumentative. A group that is always at the margin are the over-attentive, those people you wish you could get rid off but who never give you any real motive for doing so.

The obsessive are those that keep on nursing old griefs, they are mainly humiliated males that want to get their payback. They keep on harassing you long after you banned them, and will go as far as posting regularly about you and your activities and will look for any ways to get in contact with you. They have elephant memories and can remember everything that was ever posted by or about you. They however lack any sense of logic and will entertain the most amusing or downright puzzling theories about you and your psychology. The best way to get rid of them is to ignore them, which is why I will not mention any name and directly go into the discussion of:

The abusive are much less of a bother, they will just show up one day and begin hurling abuse at you. A quick ban gets rid of them. In other cases though, the abusive start out as regular folks making nice and reflective comments, and will gradually evolve into more hurtful and subtly aggressive notes. They are the passive-aggressive, who are much more difficult to detect and ban in time, especially since they are often able to trick you into liking them at first. Examples of such toxic people are [info]akfelecia2, [info]quasidan or [info]ghostlight. Behind their attractive appearance lies a psychotic personality that never will let out any real feeling and is unable to have any truthful and honest interaction.

The argumentative are a common breed on livejournal, they are people that insist on being taken seriously even when their drivel does not warrant any serious attention. They are convinced of their rectitude and of their right to take you to account for any of your misunderstood utterances. They often have an agenda, though it can be summarized as "I am right, I am always right, I am always absolutely right". Examples are [info]tyrven, [info]talam or [info]1001nuits, though I must admit I have a hard time distinguishing them from the abusive. They might be amusing to entertain at first but will end up draining too much of your energy, by which time your terse responses to their pamphlets will have enraged them to the point of the abusive.

Finally, the over-attentive, whom I could also call the mildly annoying, are those people who will keep making random uninteresting comments, with no real purpose and without being able to attract any real interest on your part. While I label them as over-attentive, I suspect them to be attention seekers who wish to trade their attention for some attention paid to them. Of course, this is a lost cause and they thankfully stop commenting after a while, diverting their attention to nicer personalities than mine. They otherwise turn out of frustration into another of the above categories. Note they often have relationship problems in their life and seek to compensate on LJ.

So, this is the list. I am not sure everyone fits into one of the above categories, because I can't remember why I banned most of them. I guess I could add a category of the forgettable that would account for them.

[info]kingdeadfish; [info]indis_earfalas; [info]jewkunt; [info]kamuela; [info]killhamster[info]space_cowboy[info]proud_feminazi[info]vijucat[info]sharkcowsheep[info]justflyakite[info]splatterhouse; [info]akfelecia2[info]ghostlight[info]auntiesiannan; [info]death_blossom[info]manic_geisha[info]bkirz189[info]bellazoemom[info]hw_lineaire[info]slow_vock[info]uber1337n3ss[info]sheffield_libby[info]yufice[info]mort_de_coeurs[info]tristis_[info]bkblue1[info]jcterminal[info]oakianus[info]dojothemouse[info]ericrobertwhite[info]hothead[info]akfelecia[info]fullmoonartist[info]magnusmagnus[info]bkred1[info]moderndayknight[info]kekepania[info]woelfchen[info]stevesapphire[info]njyoder[info]gabriel4580[info]dietotaku[info]reduce_me[info]kholnuu[info]cubanicepick[info]_froggy_[info]lennyt[info]flame_king[info]somnambulisa[info]antiseptique[info]special_boots[info]evil_genius[info]hom3wr3ck3r[info]overkillit[info]rocketgeek[info]i_heart_john[info]misstyzek[info]nzgoddess[info]femayls_rule[info]talam[info]fidelity_astro[info]jameth[info]elyrean[info]__sexcapades[info]malasadas[info]tyrven[info]glory_2_god[info]itsalljustaride[info]gushgush[info]bkblue[info]hklown[info]mojo_iv[info]evilsadist[info]catwoman980[info]lawrn[info]assassine[info]retius[info]coolstring[info]wyattgwyon[info]spilltheblood[info]lebenslinien[info]ultraskuzzi[info]pinktomatosoup[info]terry_terrible[info]1001nuits[info]majinbluedragon[info]earthwormgrim[info]dopey1[info]bkblue2[info]xiker911[info]shivaslastdance[info]champion[info]noboru[info]artmonkey[info]immolatedeffigy[info]quasidan[info]rfjason[info]pulldontpush[info]x1harrypotter1x[info]utopiavista[info]juliesmagicmoon[info]ts_garp[info]akasha6915[info]laruocco2004[info]almighty_jue[info]imperfectbrat[info]dotcomnerd[info]jalirious



(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]colorwhirl
2006-08-04 11:55 am UTC (link)
I'm astonished that [info]ghostlight hit the ban_set. I thought you were pleasantly amused with their malleable tendencies.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-04 12:00 pm UTC (link)
Yes, I know, they are an example of the superficially amusing but ultimately annoying. I think I used some veiled abuse of theirs as a pretext for banning, which was not a loss since I do not really value interaction with them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sophiaserpentia
2006-08-04 01:49 pm UTC (link)
I recognize some of these names, mostly from communities.

In general i have only banned people for being repetitively abusive, though i have pre-emptively banned a few virulently anti-feminist troll types.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-04 02:11 pm UTC (link)
Yes, I used to be more patient and banning people only after several bad interactions. I even toyed with unbanning. Then I realized there was little point in trying to 'win over' or being patient with abusive people or in being 'tough' and tolerating them. I am much more trigger happy those days because I realized people don't change, at least not within an acceptable timeframe.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]sophiaserpentia
2006-08-04 02:32 pm UTC (link)
Then I realized there was little point in trying to 'win over' or being patient with abusive people or in being 'tough' and tolerating them.

Yep.

The main reason i ban people from my journal is because i see that they have a hateful agenda, and there is absolutely no reason to let such people turn my tiny corner of cyberspace into their platform.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]madamealexis
2006-08-04 02:30 pm UTC (link)
That is one huge fan club.

LOL... Harry Potter!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-04 02:59 pm UTC (link)
There should be a community for them, though that would not be a pretty sight

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ammre
2006-08-04 04:48 pm UTC (link)
I have one banned person, they were in the last category. over-attentive. I was on my way to having more but then i left all those crazy communities.

(Reply to this)


[info]wbm
2006-08-04 10:10 pm UTC (link)
I've never banned anyone. I just make fun of them til they cry & run or get so pissed-off they pop a blood vessel.

It's all part of the entertainment of the LJ experience. To me, anyways. Maybe it's just one of those rare things for which I have the patience.

Is there still room for a mildly retarded, smartassed Canadian guy around here? I swear I know what deodourant is for.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-07 09:10 am UTC (link)
"I just make fun of them til they cry & run or get so pissed-off they pop a blood vessel."

Wow, you are one strong man.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]wbm
2006-08-07 01:24 pm UTC (link)
That's unexpected - you trying to make fun of me for not being everything you hate about men.

Interesting...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-07 02:40 pm UTC (link)
MMm, reading comprehension check, please.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]wbm
2006-08-07 03:50 pm UTC (link)
Ah. Sorry - I'm so used to LJ sarcasm, I figure everyone's laying down zingers.

Upon re-reading, to similize some Hollywood, the way I phrased my LJ prowess made me sound like Darth Vader.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fishknifeseller
2006-08-04 10:25 pm UTC (link)
What if you want to ban an over-attentive who is your friend in real life? I should never have told her about LJ.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]disconscious
2006-08-07 09:11 am UTC (link)
Ban her in real life.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]subj_to_debate
2006-08-05 12:49 am UTC (link)
i. love. this. post.

(Reply to this)


[info]jmshadowdancer
2006-08-05 04:58 am UTC (link)
I probably count as one of the boring people. But that's because I have a boring life. I do like to read up on you once in a while, I find you quite interesting. Alas, I write for me, and not for anyone else, but I don't expect any feedback, if it happens it happens. Heh. If I'm on this list somehow (I'm too damned lazy to read it) I apologize for being so boring. If not, keep writing, and I'll keep reading, even if I don't always comment. Hearto.

(Reply to this)


(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…